 |
Civil Defense Now! REPOST: Biological and Chemical Terrorism: Strategic Plan for
Preparedness and Response Recommendations of the CDC
Strategic Planning Workgroup
By Richard A. Fleetwood - May 2001
This page reprints a very lengthy report sent out via email to subscribers of the CDC MMWR email list(one I subscribe to, and have for a while), a monthly email lists that updates first responders and public safety workers with the latest threats, incidents, and technology news in Threat Assessment in biological and chemical threats. I feel it is well worth reposting, and feel certain that this site is one of the best places for it. You can follow the links contained within to read the original report in PDF format, or to verify that this page is completely representative of the original document.
Richard
Founder - SurvivalRing
Subj: April 21, 2000 ASCII Recommendations and Reports 1 of 1
Date: 4/20/00 5:06:01 PM Central Daylight Time
From: mmwrq@CDC.GOV (MMWR Questions)
Sender: mmwrq@CDC.GOV
Reply-to: mmwrq@CDC.GOV (MMWR Questions)
To: MMWR-ASC@LISTSERV.CDC.GOV
The April 21, 2000 ASCII text edition of the edition
of the MMWR Recommendations and Reports is enclosed.
View this MMWR Recommendations
and Reports at:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr
and
ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Publications/mmwr/rr/rr4904.pdf
* Biological and Chemical Terrorism: Strategic Plan for
Preparedness and Response Recommendations of the CDC
Strategic Planning Workgroup
http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4904a1.htm
The file types available are Adobe Acrobat (PDF), and ASCII
(TXT). The ASCII version of the journal does not contain figures.
The PDF files, contain graphics and figures and are true
representations of the hard copy of the MMWR. The
Adobe Acrobat format requires an Adobe Reader.
The Adobe Acrobat files will be e-mailed
in uuencoded format. If your e-mail system does not
automatically uudecode the file, you will need to
uudecode the file manually.
-------------------------------------------------
Accessing MMWR Using E-mail
-------------------------------------------------
If you have World-Wide Web (WWW) or File Transfer
Protocol (FTP) capabilities, we strongly recommend
that you access MMWR by using WWW or FTP rather
than through e-mail. This is due to the large size
of the PDF files and the complexity of sending
e-mail to different systems.
---------------------------------------------
ENTIRE ISSUES
---------------------------------------------
To obtain the entire MMWR issue via e-mail,
send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.CDC.GOV
with the following in the body of your message:
GET MMWR LOG0004C
If you have problems or questions, send e-mail to
mmwrq@cdc.gov
CDC's official MMWR electronic copy of record is the MMWR in Adobe Acrobat
portable document format (.pdf). The .pdf MMWR is identical in content to
the paper copy of record. The MMWR text that follows is in ASCII text file
format and has not been proofread. An adequate ASCII translation does not
exist for each character possibly present in the .pdf file, and there may be
other significant charater translation errors. Also, the ASCII text that
follows lacks the figures and tables of the electronic .pdf and paper format
of MMWR. Therefore, CDC does not consider this ASCII text file to represent
a copy of record of the MMWR.
Biological and Chemical Terrorism:
Strategic Plan for Preparedness and Response
Recommendations of the CDC Strategic Planning Workgroup
". . . and he that will not apply new remedies must expect new evils;
for time is the greatest innovator. . . ."
-The Essays by Sir Francis Bacon, 1601
Summary
The U.S. national civilian vulnerability to the deliberate use of
biological and chemical agents has been highlighted by recognition of
substantial biological weapons development programs and arsenals in foreign
countries, attempts to acquire or possess biological agents by militants,
and high-profile terrorist attacks. Evaluation of this vulnerability has
focused on the role public health will have detecting and managing the
probable covert biological terrorist incident with the realization that the
U.S. local, state, and federal infrastructure is already strained as a
result of other important public health problems. In partnership with
representatives for local and state health departments, other federal
agencies, and medical and public health professional associations, CDC has
developed a strategic plan to address the deliberate dissemination of
biological or chemical agents. The plan contains recommendations to reduce
U.S. vulnerability to biological and chemical terrorism - preparedness
planning, detection and surveillance, laboratory analysis, emergency
response, and communication systems. Training and research are integral
components for achieving these recommendations. Success of the plan hinges
on strengthening the relationships between medical and public health
professionals and on building new partner-ships with emergency management,
the military, and law enforcement professionals.
INTRODUCTION
An act of biological or chemical terrorism might range from
dissemination of aerosolized anthrax spores to food product contamination,
and predicting when and how such an attack might occur is not possible.
However, the possibility of biological or chemical terrorism should not be
ignored, especially in light of events during the past 10 years (e.g., the
sarin gas attack in the Tokyo subway [1 ] and the discovery of military
bioweapons programs in Iraq and the former Soviet Union [2 ]). Preparing the
nation to address this threat is a formidable challenge, but the
consequences of being unprepared could be devastating.
The public health infrastructure must be prepared to prevent illness
and injury that would result from biological and chemical terrorism,
especially a covert terrorist attack. As with emerging infectious diseases,
early detection and control of biological or chemical attacks depends on a
strong and flexible public health system at the local, state, and federal
levels. In addition, primary health-care providers throughout the United
States must be vigilant because they will probably be the first to observe
and report unusual illnesses or injuries.
This report is a summary of the recommendations made by CDC's Strategic
Planning Workgroup in Preparedness and Response to Biological and Chemical
Terrorism: A Strategic Plan (CDC, unpublished report, 2000), which outlines
steps for strengthening public health and health-care capacity to protect
the United States against these dangers. This strategic plan marks the first
time that CDC has joined with law enforcement, intelligence, and defense
agencies in addition to traditional CDC partners to address a national
security threat.
As a reflection of the need for broad-based public health involvement
in terrorism preparedness and planning, staff from CDC's centers, institute,
and offices participated in developing the strategic plan, including the
-National Center for Infectious Diseases,
-National Center for Environmental Health,
-Public Health Practice Program Office,
-Epidemiology Program Office,
-National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
-Office of Health and Safety,
-National Immunization Program, and
-National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) is also
participating with CDC in this effort and will provide expertise in the area
of industrial chemical terrorism. In this report, the term CDC includes
ATSDR when activities related to chemical terrorism are discussed. In
addition, colleagues from local, state, and federal agencies; emergency
medical services (EMS); professional societies; universities and medical
centers; and private industry provided suggestions and constructive
criticism.
Combating biological and chemical terrorism will require capitalizing
on advances in technology, information systems, and medical sciences.
Preparedness will also require a re-examination of core public health
activities (e.g., disease surveillance) in light of these advances.
Preparedness efforts by public health agencies and primary health-care
providers to detect and respond to biological and chemical terrorism will
have the added benefit of strengthening the U.S. capacity for identifying
and controlling injuries and emerging infectious diseases.
U.S. VULNERABILITY TO BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL TERRORISM
Terrorist incidents in the United States and elsewhere involving
bacterial pathogens (3), nerve gas (1), and a lethal plant toxin (i.e.,
ricin) (4), have demonstrated that the United States is vulnerable to
biological and chemical threats as well as explosives. Recipes for preparing
"homemade" agents are readily available (5), and reports of arsenals of
military bioweapons (2) raise the possibility that terrorists might have
access to highly dangerous agents, which have been engineered for mass
dissemination as small-particle aerosols. Such agents as the variola virus,
the causative agent of smallpox, are highly contagious and often fatal.
Responding to large-scale outbreaks caused by these agents will require the
rapid mobilization of public health workers, emergency responders, and
private health-care providers. Large-scale outbreaks will also require rapid
procurement and distribution of large quantities of drugs and vaccines,
which must be available quickly.
OVERT VERSUS COVERT TERRORIST ATTACKS
In the past, most planning for emergency response to terrorism has been
concerned with overt attacks (e.g., bombings). Chemical terrorism acts are
likely to be overt because the effects of chemical agents absorbed through
inhalation or by absorption through the skin or mucous membranes are usually
immediate and obvious. Such attacks elicit immediate response from police,
fire, and EMS personnel.
In contrast, attacks with biological agents are more likely to be
covert. They present different challenges and require an additional
dimension of emergency planning that involves the public health
infrastructure (Box 1). Covert dissemination of a biological agent in a
public place will not have an immediate impact because of the delay between
exposure and onset of illness (i.e., the incubation period). Consequently,
the first casualties of a covert attack probably will be identified by
physicians or other primary health-care providers. For example, in the event
of a covert release of the contagious variola virus, patients will appear in
doctors' offices, clinics, and emergency rooms during the first or second
week, complaining of fever, back pain, headache, nausea, and other symptoms
of what initially might appear to be an ordinary viral infection. As the
disease progresses, these persons will develop the papular rash
characteristic of early-stage smallpox, a rash that physicians might not
recognize immediately. By the time the rash becomes pustular and patients
begin to die, the terrorists would be far away and the disease disseminated
through the population by person-to-person contact. Only a short window of
opportunity will exist between the time the first cases are identified and a
second wave of the population becomes ill. During that brief period, public
health officials will need to determine that an attack has occurred,
identify the organism, and prevent more casualties through prevention
strategies (e.g., mass vaccination or prophylactic treatment). As
person-to-person contact continues, successive waves of transmission could
carry infection to other worldwide localities. These issues might also be
relevant for other person-to-person transmissible etiologic agents (e.g.,
plague or certain viral hemorrhagic fevers).
Certain chemical agents can also be delivered covertly through
contaminated food or water. In 1999, the vulnerability of the food supply
was illustrated in Belgium, when chickens were unintentionally exposed to
dioxin-contaminated fat used to make animal feed (6). Because the
contamination was not discovered for months, the dioxin, a cancer-causing
chemical that does not cause immediate symptoms in humans, was probably
present in chicken meat and eggs sold in Europe during early 1999. This
incident underscores the need for prompt diagnoses of unusual or suspicious
health problems in animals as well as humans, a lesson that was also
demonstrated by the recent outbreak of mosquitoborne West Nile virus in
birds and humans in New York City in 1999. The dioxin episode also
demonstrates how a covert act of foodborne biological or chemical terrorism
could affect commerce and human or animal health.
FOCUSING PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES
Early detection of and response to biological or chemical terrorism are
crucial. Without special preparation at the local and state levels, a
large-scale attack with variola virus, aerosolized anthrax spores, a nerve
gas, or a foodborne biological or chemical agent could overwhelm the local
and perhaps national public health infrastructure. Large numbers of
patients, including both infected persons and the "worried well," would seek
medical attention, with a corresponding need for medical supplies,
diagnostic tests, and hospital beds. Emergency responders, health-care
workers, and public health officials could be at special risk, and everyday
life would be disrupted as a result of widespread fear of contagion.
Preparedness for terrorist-caused outbreaks and injuries is an
essential component of the U.S. public health surveillance and response
system, which is designed to protect the population against any unusual
public health event (e.g., influenza pandemics, contaminated municipal water
supplies, or intentional dissemination of Yersinia pestis , the causative
agent of plague [7 ]). The epidemiologic skills, surveillance methods,
diagnostic techniques, and physical resources required to detect and
investigate unusual or unknown diseases, as well as syndromes or injuries
caused by chemical accidents, are similar to those needed to identify and
respond to an attack with a biological or chemical agent. However, public
health agencies must prepare also for the special features a terrorist
attack probably would have (e.g., mass casualties or the use of rare agents)
(Boxes 2-5). Terrorists might use combinations of these agents, attack in
more than one location simultaneously, use new agents, or use organisms that
are not on the critical list (e.g., common, drug-resistant, or genetically
engineered pathogens). Lists of critical biological and chemical agents will
need to be modified as new information becomes available. In addition, each
state and locality will need to adapt the lists to local conditions and
preparedness needs by using the criteria provided in CDC's strategic plan.
Potential biological and chemical agents are numerous, and the public
health infrastructure must be equipped to quickly resolve crises that would
arise from a biological or chemical attack. However, to best protect the
public, the preparedness efforts must be focused on agents that might have
the greatest impact on U.S. health and security, especially agents that are
highly contagious or that can be engineered for widespread dissemination via
small-particle aerosols. Preparing the nation to address these dangers is a
major challenge to U.S. public health systems and health-care providers.
Early detection requires increased biological and chemical terrorism
awareness among front-line health-care providers because they are in the
best position to report suspicious illnesses and injuries. Also, early
detection will require improved communication systems between those
providers and public health officials. In addition, state and local
health-care agencies must have enhanced capacity to investigate unusual
events and unexplained illnesses, and diagnostic laboratories must be
equipped to identify biological and chemical agents that rarely are seen in
the United States. Fundamental to these efforts is comprehensive, integrated
training designed to ensure core competency in public health preparedness
and the highest levels of scientific expertise among local, state, and
federal partners.
KEY FOCUS AREAS
CDC's strategic plan is based on the following five focus areas, with
each area integrating training and research:
-preparedness and prevention;
-detection and surveillance;
-diagnosis and characterization of biological and chemical agents;
-response; and
-communication.
Preparedness and Prevention
Detection, diagnosis, and mitigation of illness and injury caused by
biological and chemical terrorism is a complex process that involves
numerous partners and activities. Meeting this challenge will require
special emergency preparedness in all cities and states. CDC will provide
public health guidelines, support, and technical assistance to local and
state public health agencies as they develop coordinated preparedness plans
and response protocols. CDC also will provide self-assessment tools for
terrorism preparedness, including performance standards, attack simulations,
and other exercises. In addition, CDC will encourage and support applied
research to develop innovative tools and strategies to prevent or mitigate
illness and injury caused by biological and chemical terrorism.
Detection and Surveillance
Early detection is essential for ensuring a prompt response to a
biological or chemical attack, including the provision of prophylactic
medicines, chemical antidotes, or vaccines. CDC will integrate surveillance
for illness and injury resulting from biological and chemical terrorism into
the U.S. disease surveillance systems, while developing new mechanisms for
detecting, evaluating, and reporting suspicious events that might represent
covert terrorist acts. As part of this effort, CDC and state and local
health agencies will form partnerships with front-line medical personnel in
hospital emergency departments, hospital care facilities, poison control
centers, and other offices to enhance detection and reporting of unexplained
injuries and illnesses as part of routine surveillance mechanisms for
biological and chemical terrorism.
Diagnosis and Characterization of Biological and Chemical Agents
CDC and its partners will create a multilevel laboratory response
network for bioterrorism (LRNB). That network will link clinical labs to
public health agencies in all states, districts, territories, and selected
cities and counties and to state-of-the-art facilities that can analyze
biological agents (Figure 1). As part of this effort, CDC will transfer
diagnostic technology to state health laboratories and others who will
perform initial testing. CDC will also create an in-house rapid-response and
advanced technology (RRAT) laboratory. This laboratory will provide
around-the-clock diagnostic confirmatory and reference support for terrorism
response teams. This network will include the regional chemical laboratories
for diagnosing human exposure to chemical agents and provide links with
other departments (e.g., the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which is
responsible for environmental sampling).
Response
A comprehensive public health response to a biological or chemical
terrorist event involves epidemiologic investigation, medical treatment and
prophylaxis for affected persons, and the initiation of disease prevention
or environmental decontamination measures. CDC will assist state and local
health agencies in developing resources and expertise for investigating
unusual events and unexplained illnesses. In the event of a confirmed
terrorist attack, CDC will coordinate with other federal agencies in accord
with Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) 39. PDD 39 designates the Federal
Bureau of Investigation as the lead agency for the crisis plan and charges
the Federal Emergency Management Agency with ensuring that the federal
response management is adequate to respond to the consequences of terrorism
(8). If requested by a state health agency, CDC will deploy response teams
to investigate unexplained or suspicious illnesses or unusual etiologic
agents and provide on-site consultation regarding medical management and
disease control. To ensure the availability, procurement, and delivery of
medical supplies, devices, and equipment that might be needed to respond to
terrorist-caused illness or injury, CDC will maintain a national
pharmaceutical stockpile.
Communication Systems
U.S. preparedness to mitigate the public health consequences of
biological and chemical terrorism depends on the coordinated activities of
well-trained health-care and public health personnel throughout the United
States who have access to up-to-the minute emergency information. Effective
communication with the public through the news media will also be essential
to limit terrorists' ability to induce public panic and disrupt daily life.
During the next 5 years, CDC will work with state and local health agencies
to develop a) a state-of-the-art communication system that will support
disease surveillance; b) rapid notification and information exchange
regarding disease outbreaks that are possibly related to bioterrorism; c)
dissemination of diagnostic results and emergency health information; and d)
coordination of emergency response activities. Through this network and
similar mechanisms, CDC will provide terrorism-related training to
epidemiologists and laboratorians, emergency responders, emergency
department personnel and other front-line health-care providers, and health
and safety personnel.
PARTNERSHIPS AND IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation of the objectives outlined in CDC's strategic plan will
be coordinated through CDC's Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Program.
Program personnel are charged with a) helping build local and state
preparedness, b) developing U.S. expertise regarding potential threat
agents, and c) coordinating response activities during actual bioterrorist
events. Program staff have established priorities for 2000-2002 regarding
the focus areas (Box 6).
Implementation will require collaboration with state and local public
health agencies, as well as with other persons and groups, including
-public health organizations,
-medical research centers,
-health-care providers and their networks,
-professional societies,
-medical examiners,
-emergency response units and responder organizations,
-safety and medical equipment manufacturers,
-the U.S. Office of Emergency Preparedness and other Department of Health
and Human Services agencies,
-other federal agencies, and
-international organizations.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Implementing CDC's strategic preparedness and response plan by 2004
will ensure the following outcomes:
-U.S. public health agencies and health-care providers will be prepared to
mitigate illness and injuries that result from acts of biological and
chemical terrorism.
Public health surveillance for infectious diseases and injuries -- including
events that might indicate terrorist activity -- will be timely and
complete, and reporting of suspected terrorist events will be integrated
with the evolving, comprehensive networks of the national public health
surveillance system.
-The national laboratory response network for bioterrorism will be extended
to include facilities in all 50 states. The network will include CDC's
environmental health laboratory for chemical terrorism and four regional
facilities.
-State and federal public health departments will be equipped with
state-of-the-art tools for rapid epidemiological investigation and control
of suspected or confirmed acts of biological or chemical terrorism, and a
designated stock of terrorism-related medical supplies will be available
through a national pharmaceutical stockpile.
-A cadre of well-trained health-care and public health workers will be
available in every state. Their terrorism-related activities will be
coordinated through a rapid and efficient communication system that links
U.S. public health agencies and their partners.
CONCLUSION
Recent threats and use of biological and chemical agents against
civilians have exposed U.S. vulnerability and highlighted the need to
enhance our capacity to detect and control terrorist acts. The U.S. must be
protected from an extensive range of critical biological and chemical
agents, including some that have been developed and stockpiled for military
use. Even without threat of war, investment in national defense ensures
preparedness and acts as a deterrent against hostile acts. Similarly,
investment in the public health system provides the best civil defense
against bioterrorism. Tools developed in response to terrorist threats serve
a dual purpose. They help detect rare or unusual disease outbreaks and
respond to health emergencies, including naturally occurring outbreaks or
industrial injuries that might resemble terrorist events in their
unpredictability and ability to cause mass casualties (e.g., a pandemic
influenza outbreak or a large-scale chemical spill). Terrorism-preparedness
activities described in CDC's plan, including the development of a public
health communication infrastructure, a multilevel network of diagnostic
laboratories, and an integrated disease surveillance system, will improve
our ability to investigate rapidly and control public health threats that
emerge in the twenty first century.
References
1. Okumura T, Suzuki K, Fukuda A, et al. Tokyo subway sarin attack; disaster
management, Part 1: community emergency response. Acad Emerg Med
1998;5:613-7.
2. Davis, CJ. Nuclear blindness: an overview of the biological weapons
programs of the former Soviet Union and Iraq. Emerg Infect Dis
1999;5:509-12.
3. Torok TJ, Tauxe RV, Wise RP, et al. Large community outbreak of
Salmonellosis caused by intentional contamination of restaurant salad bars.
JAMA 1997;278:389-95.
4. Tucker JB. Chemical/biological terrorism: coping with a new threat.
Politics and the Life Sciences 1996;15:167-184.
5. Uncle Fester. Silent death. 2nd ed. Port Townsend, WA: Loompanics
Unlimited, 1997.
6. Ashraf H. European dioxin-contaminated food crisis grows and grows
[news]. Lancet 1999;353:2049.
7. Janofsky M. Looking for motives in plague case. New York Times. May 28,
1995:A18.
8. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Federal response plan. Washington,
DC: Government Printing Office, 1999. Available at less than
http://www.fema.gov/r-n-r/frp greater than . Accessed February 3, 2000.
BOX 1. Local public health agency preparedness
-Because the initial detection of a covert biological or chemical attack
will probably occur at the local level, disease surveillance systems at
state and local health agencies must be capable of detecting unusual
patterns of disease or injury, including those caused by unusual or unknown
threat agents.
-Because the initial response to a covert biological or chemical attack will
probably be made at the local level, epidemiologists at state and local
health agencies must have expertise and resources for responding to reports
of clusters of rare, unusual, or unexplained illnesses.
BOX 2. Preparing public health agencies for biological attacks
Steps in Preparing for Biological Attacks
-Enhance epidemiologic capacity to detect and respond to biological attacks.
-Supply diagnostic reagents to state and local public health agencies.
-Establish communication programs to ensure delivery of accurate
information.
-Enhance bioterrorism-related education and training for health-care
professionals.
-Prepare educational materials that will inform and reassure the public
during and after a biological attack.
-Stockpile appropriate vaccines and drugs.
-Establish molecular surveillance for microbial strains, including unusual
or drug- resistant strains.
-Support the development of diagnostic tests.
-Encourage research on antiviral drugs and vaccines.
BOX 3. Critical biological agents
Category A
The U.S. public health system and primary health-care providers must be
prepared to address varied biological agents, including pathogens that are
rarely seen in the United States. High-priority agents include organisms
that pose a risk to national security because they
can be easily disseminated or transmitted person-to-person;
cause high mortality, with potential for major public health impact;
might cause public panic and social disruption; and
require special action for public health preparedness (Box 2).
Category A agents include
-variola major (smallpox);
-Bacillus anthracis (anthrax);
-Yersinia pestis (plague);
-Clostridium botulinum toxin (botulism);
-Francisella tularensis (tularaemia);
-filoviruses,
--Ebola hemorrhagic fever,
--Marburg hemorrhagic fever; and
-arenaviruses,
--Lassa (Lassa fever),
--Junin (Argentine hemorrhagic fever) and related viruses.
Category B
Second highest priority agents include those that
-are moderately easy to disseminate;
-cause moderate morbidity and low mortality; and
-require specific enhancements of CDC's diagnostic capacity and enhanced
disease surveillance.
Category B agents include
-Coxiella burnetti (Q fever);
-Brucella species (brucellosis);
-Burkholderia mallei (glanders);
-alphaviruses,
--Venezuelan encephalomyelitis,
--eastern and western equine encephalomyelitis;
-ricin toxin from Ricinus communis (castor beans);
-epsilon toxin of Clostridium perfringens; and
-Staphylococcus enterotoxin B.
A subset of List B agents includes pathogens that are food- or
waterborne.
These pathogens include but are not limited to
-Salmonella species,
-Shigella dysenteriae,
-Escherichia coli O157:H7,
-Vibrio cholerae, and
-Cryptosporidium parvum.
Category C
Third highest priority agents include emerging pathogens that could be
engineered for mass dissemination in the future because of
-availability;
-ease of production and dissemination; and
-potential for high morbidity and mortality and major health impact.
Category C agents include
-Nipah virus,
-hantaviruses,
-tickborne hemorrhagic fever viruses,
-tickborne encephalitis viruses,
-yellow fever, and
-multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
Preparedness for List C agents requires ongoing research to improve
disease detection, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Knowing in advance
which newly emergent pathogens might be employed by terrorists is not
possible; therefore, linking bioterrorism preparedness efforts with ongoing
disease surveillance and outbreak response activities as defined in CDC's
emerging infectious disease strategy is imperative.*
*CDC. Preventing emerging infectious diseases: a strategy for the 21st
century. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
1998.
BOX 4. Preparing public health agencies for chemical attacks
Steps in Preparing for Chemical Attacks
-Enhance epidemiologic capacity for detecting and responding to chemical
attacks.
-Enhance awareness of chemical terrorism among emergency medical service
personnel, police officers, firefighters, physicians, and nurses.
-Stockpile chemical antidotes.
-Develop and provide bioassays for detection and diagnosis of chemical
injuries.
-Prepare educational materials to inform the public during and after a
chemical attack
BOX 5. Chemical agents
Chemical agents that might be used by terrorists range from warfare
agents to toxic chemicals commonly used in industry. Criteria for
determining priority chemical agents include
-chemical agents already known to be used as weaponry;
-availability of chemical agents to potential terrorists;
-chemical agents likely to cause major morbidity or mortality;
-potential of agents for causing public panic and social disruption; and
-agents that require special action for public health preparedness (Box 4).
Categories of chemical agents include
-nerve agents,
--tabun (ethyl N,N-dimethylphosphoramidocyanidate),
--sarin (isopropyl methylphosphanofluoridate),
--soman (pinacolyl methyl phosphonofluoridate),
--GF (cyclohexylmethylphosphonofluoridate),
--VX (o-ethyl-[S]-[2-diisopropylaminoethyl]-methylphosphonothiolate);
-blood agents,
--hydrogen cyanide,
--cyanogen chloride;
-blister agents,
--lewisite (an aliphatic arsenic compound, 2-chlorovinyldichloroarsine),
--nitrogen and sulfur mustards,
--phosgene oxime;
-heavy metals,
--arsenic,
--lead,
--mercury;
-Volatile toxins,
--benzene,
--chloroform,
--trihalomethanes;
-pulmonary agents,
--phosgene,
--chlorine,
--vinyl chloride;
-incapacitating agents,
--BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate);
-pesticides, persistent and nonpersistent;
-dioxins, furans, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs);
-explosive nitro compounds and oxidizers,
--ammonium nitrate combined with fuel oil;
-flammable industrial gases and liquids,
--gasoline,
--propane;
-poison industrial gases, liquids, and solids,
--cyanides,
--nitriles; and
-corrosive industrial acids and bases,
--nitric acid,
--sulfuric acid.
Because of the hundreds of new chemicals introduced internationally
each month, treating exposed persons by clinical syndrome rather than by
specific agent is more useful for public health planning and emergency
medical response purposes. Public health agencies and first responders might
render the most aggressive, timely, and clinically relevant treatment
possible by using treatment modalities based on syndromic categories (e.g.,
burns and trauma, cardiorespiratory failure, neurologic damage, and shock).
These activities must be linked with authorities responsible for
environmental sampling and decontamination.
BOX 6. Implementation Priorities Regarding Focus Areas for 2000-2002
Preparedness and Prevention
-Maintain a public health preparedness and response cooperative agreement
that provides support to state health agencies who are working with local
agencies in developing coordinated bioterrorism plans and protocols.
-Establish a national public health distance-learning system that provides
biological and chemical terrorism preparedness training to health-care
workers and to state and local public health workers.
-Disseminate public health guidelines and performance standards on
biological and chemical terrorism preparedness planning for use by state and
local health agencies.
Detection and Surveillance
-Strengthen state and local surveillance systems for illness and injury
resulting from pathogens and chemical substances that are on CDC s critical
agents list.
-Develop new algorithms and statistical methods for searching medical
databases on a real-time basis for evidence of suspicious events.
-Establish criteria for investigating and evaluating suspicious clusters of
human or animal disease or injury and triggers for notifying law enforcement
of suspected acts of biological or chemical terrorism.
Diagnosis and Characterization of Biological and Chemical Agents
-Establish a multilevel laboratory response network for bioterrorism that
links public health agencies to advanced capacity facilities for the
identification an reporting of critical biological agents.
-Establish regional chemical terrorism laboratories that will provide
diagnostic capacity during terrorist attacks involving chemical agents.
-Establish a rapid-response and advanced technology laboratory within CDC to
provide around-the-clock diagnostic support to bioterrorism response teams
and expedite molecular characterization of critical biological agents.
Response
-Assist state and local health agencies in organizing response capacities to
rapidly deploy in the event of an overt attack or a suspicious outbreak that
might be the result of a covert attack.
-Ensure that procedures are in place for rapid mobilization of CDC terrorism
response teams that will provide on-site assistance to local health workers,
security agents, and law enforcement officers.
-Establish a national pharmaceutical stockpile to provide medical supplies
in the event of a terrorist attack that involves biological or chemical
agents.
Communication Systems
-Establish a national electronic infrastructure to improve exchange of
emergency health information among local, state, and federal health
agencies.
-Implement an emergency communication plan that ensures rapid dissemination
of health information to the public during actual, threatened, or suspected
acts of biological or chemical terrorism.
-Create a website that disseminates bioterrorism preparedness and training
information, as well as other bioterrorism-related emergency information, to
public health and health-care workers and the public.
Again, this reprint from an email is provided as a service to those who worry about threats from biological and chemical weapons that might occur in the very near future. Please forward to those who may wish to learn more about these threats, and how to counteract them.
Updated May 2001 - © 2001 By Richard A. Fleetwood |
 |