Since the middle ages of the Age of Civil Defense, there has been great talk and massive discussions of how to save people in regional (or catastrophic) threats or disasters. You know, a dam is about to burst upstream, and public safety is trying to get all the people living downstream to safe ground. We saw with Hurricane Katrina, one of the nation's worst ever natural disasters, that the potential for evacuating tens of thousands
of people from CERTAIN death (downtown New Orleans being 20 feet BELOW sea level), was a good idea...but obviously wasn't activated nor put to any use. Hundreds of school buses and city buses, meanwhile, where unusable when flood waters filled bus parking areas all over the city.
In the days after the storm passed, and tens of thousands were bussed from the afflicted areas to host towns and cities all over the mid and south west, many other problems occurred, with crime, injuries, even death occurring in the locations where the relocated victims took up residence in school gyms, hotels, armories, and the like.
In other words, a flat out, cluster fuck, of incredible proportions. (pardon my french, but it is what it was).
Many books have been written by a wide array of authors, some scholarly, some tripe, but very few with objective review of practices and creation of workable solutions. Oh, and hundreds of reports on crisis relocation, from all over the emergency management and academic spectrum of ideas. Can we learn anything from any of these writings?
I think so. I've collected dozens of historical, government produced records in PDF format, and will be posting them on SurvivalRing the next few weeks. I would ask you, that if you ever have concerns about "bugging out", or even "bugging in", that you review these reports over the next few weeks, and learn what Big Brother still might consider applying to the populace, should another Katrina size event approach any portion of our great nation. Why? So you can stay ahead of the curve of "victim of a disaster".
I'll start posting the first reports tomorrow. Comments and discussion are welcome.
Rich
The disarmament movement for decades has hyped that with nukes; all will die or it will be so bad you'll wish you had. Most have bought into it, now thinking it futile, bordering on lunacy, to try to learn how to survive a nuclear blast and radioactive fallout.
Unfortunately, most govt officials have, too, as they are focused on #1- Interdiction, and #2- COG (Continuity of Govt) for when #1 fails, and have largely ignored #3 - Civil Defense training of the pubic, so they might be better prepared to save themselves from the first second of the flash of a nuke explosion.
For instance, most people now ridicule 'duck & cover', but for the vast majority, not right at 'ground zero' and already gone, the blast wave will be delayed in arriving after the flash, like lightening & thunder, anywhere from a fraction of a second up to 20 seconds, or more.
Today, without 'duck & cover' training, everyone at work, home, and your children at school, will impulsively rush to the nearest windows to see what that 'bright flash' was, just-in-time to be shredded by the glass imploding inward from that delayed blast wave. They'd never been taught that even in the open, just laying flat, reduces by eight-fold the chances of being hit by debris from that brief, 3-second, tornado strength blast.
Then, later, before the radioactive fallout can hurt them, most downwind won't know to move perpendicular away from the drift of the fallout to get out from under it before it even arrives. And, for those who can't evacuate in time, few know how quick & easy it is to throw together an expedient fallout shelter, to safely wait out the radioactive fallout as it loses 99% of its lethal intensity in the first 48 hours.
The greatest tragedy of that horrific loss of life, when nukes come to America, will be that most families had needlessly perished, out of ignorance of how easily they might have avoided becoming additional casualties, all because they erroneously thought it futile to ever try to learn how to beforehand.
The Good News About Nuclear Destruction! at www.ki4u.com/goodnews.htm dispels those deadly myths of nuclear un-survivability, empowering American families to then better survive nukes. For as long as nukes exist, these life-saving insights are essential to every families survival!
And, as a bonus, all our nations' First-Responders would be many magnitudes more effective when there are tens of thousands fewer blast & radiation casualties to later deal with.
The govt should be in the lead getting this information out to all, as it'll save many more lives than doubling the number, and funding, of First-Responders, at a fraction of the cost and time to implement!
Shane Connor
Currently, "Teach Practical Family Nuclear Civil Defense Strategies and Tactics..." is ranked NUMBER ONE, is the MOST POPULAR, and the HOTTEST IDEA on this government website.
We need to CEMENT, SOLIDIFY, and LOCK IN that number one spot, to actually GET THE ATTENTION of those in charge of nationwide preparedness, and truly obtain action towards that goal.
That is why Shane and I NEED YOUR HELP, and NOW.
It doesn't cost anything, it just takes a few minutes, and could possibly save the lives of millions SHOULD ACTUAL TRAINING get started, BEFORE a terror nuke is detonated on US soil.
I don't send these emails out lightly, and I think this may be the BEST chance we've ever had to GRAB OUR AGENCIES attention on a deadly serious topic.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE...
Take a few moments of your time to TAKE ACTION and become personally invested in a truly good thing.
Finally, PLEASE share this message with your family and friends as much as possible. Every vote for support means we will get the attention of the nation's safety and security personnel.
Thanks for reading this, and please let me know if you have any questions.
Rich
*Title*
*Department of US*
*Abstract*
The Shelter Organization and Management Guide has three major purposes. Firstly, it is a summary of current knowledge for administrative operations, and research personnel on the subject of shelter organization and management. Secondly, it is an informational aid to both trained and untrained shelter managers in an emergency situation. Thirdly, it can be incorporated into the formal course materials in training shelter managers, and other civil defense personnel. The guide is limited to the organization and management of a community fallout shelter. It does not describe equipment operation and maintenance, use of monitoring instruments, or other technical details.
*Details"
Guide to shelter organization and management
|
|
| Author(s): | Bend, Emil, Griffard, C. David, Hudak, Vivian M., Schaner, Ada J., and Shively, Aliza M. ; Office of Civil Defense. |
|---|---|
| Description: | 527 p. |
| Publication Data: | Pittsburgh, PA : American Institutes for Research. September 30, 1963 |
| Identifier/s: | OCLC Record No.: 18621859/ Misc. No.: AIRC99963TR/ Misc. No.: OCDOS62164/ Accession No.: 47048/ NTIS: AD420442 |
| Type of Item: | (REPORT) |
|
|
URLs are tested and verified at time of data entry. handle.dtic.mil/100.2/AD420442 (19mb) |
| Subjects: | 1. CIVIL DEFENSE 2. FALLOUT SHELTERS 3. MANAGEMENT |
| Summary/abstract: |
|
| Availability: | Not available on Interlibrary Loan |
*Type Of File"
*Download"
Click the link below to download this PDF file.
Left Click to READ/Right Click to SAVE AS:
===> [download id="16"]
If you find this download useful, please leave a comment below.
Thanks, Rich
*Title*
Introduction to long-term biological effects of nuclear war |
*Department of US*
*Abstract*
This report summarizes the state of knowledge and concepts about the reaction of biological systems to effects of nuclear weapons under nuclear war conditions, about the likely extent of damage to agricultural and wildlife ecosystems under nuclear war conditions, and about the factors involved in the long-term recovery potential of these systems after damage. In the study, an attempt was made to organize the available information for objective discussion of the subject, to outline the state of the art regarding capabilities to use the information (as well as its availability), and to make estimates of radiological effects using the available data and available (or new) computational methods.
*Details"
Introduction to long-term biological effects of nuclear war
|
|
| Author(s): | LaRiviere, Philip D. and Miller, Carl F. ; Office of Civil Defense. |
|---|---|
| Description: | 167 p. |
| Publication Data: | Menlo Park, CA : Stanford Research Institute. 1966 |
| Identifier/s: | OCLC Record No.: 17930706/ Misc. No.: MU5779/ Misc. No.: N228-(62479)69928/ Misc. No.: 3119A/ Accession No.: 38089/ Accession No.: 41140 |
| Type of Item: | (REPORT) |
|
|
URLs are tested and verified at time of data entry. handle.dtic.mil/100.2/AD642639 (6mb) |
| Subjects: | 1. NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS 2. NUCLEAR RADIATION 3. RADIATION EFFECTS 4. CIVIL DEFENSE |
| Summary/abstract: |
|
| Availability: | Not available on Interlibrary Loan |
*Type Of File"
*Download"
Click the link below to download this PDF file.
Left Click to READ/Right Click to SAVE AS:
===> [download id="15"]
If you find this download useful, please leave a comment below.
Thanks, Rich